Terrajectory.05 / Criteria & evidence
A developing framework connecting criteria, evidence, findings, review, governance, and improvement actions.
Discuss your projectTERRAJECTORYILLUSTRATIVEProject readiness review
What applies, and why?
What supports the finding?
Confirmed, missing, or unresolved?
What happens next?
THE QUESTION
Organizations preparing assessments, project teams organizing evidence, and qualified reviewers helping define credible evaluation.
Distinguish a binding requirement, recognized standard, best practice, and voluntary benchmark.
Connect the source, scope, record, reviewer, and evidence limitations before drawing a conclusion.
Separate supported findings, gaps, insufficient evidence, not-applicable items, and improvement opportunities.
MAKE THE WORK CONCRETE
If a project record does not establish a water-use assumption, an assessment should say what is missing, why it matters to the criterion, what record is needed, and who should obtain or review it.
Illustrative assessment example / not a certification decisionLEAIF is developing. Readiness assessment and evidence review are distinct from independent accredited assurance or certification. A future formal pathway depends on governance, competence, independence, and applicable requirements; no current accreditation is claimed.
THE NEXT CONVERSATION
Start with the project, its location, and the question you need to resolve.
We can discuss the evidence, responsibilities, and specialist input a useful scope would need.
Discuss your project info@terrajectory.com